Home
MRG Members
Advisory Board
Goals & Objectives
Contacts
Citation

 

Events

Faculty Workshops
Dissertation Workshops
Graduate Seminars

International Conferences

The Subaltern-Popular Conference 2: Re-Visioning Analytic Frames
(October 21-22, 2005)
 

The Subaltern- Popular Conference 1(March 8-9, 2004)

Publications
 

Workshop Schedule

 

The Subaltern-Popular Faculty Workshop: “The Body”

University of California, Santa Barbara

May 14-15, 2006

Venue: McCune Conference Room

Sunday, May 14

1:30pm Introduction

Session 1 Moderator: Barbara A. Holdrege, UC Santa Barbara

1:40 pm Bishnupriya Ghosh, UC Santa Barbara, "Exploding the Skin of Taste: Taslima Nasrin's Embodied Public Address" view mag cover

Mandatory Readings for Talk: Habib, Zafar, Other

2:00pm Discussion

2:30pm Anjali Arondekar, UC Santa Cruz, "Time's Corpus: Sexuality, Historiography and the Indian Penal Code"

ABSTRACT

Invocations of time and space are central to legal theorizations of homosexuality in India. From colonial sodomy statutes, to post-colonial anti-sodomy legal reform, homosexuality is recuperated through its attachments to a temporal elsewhere.  It is and is not of the"East;" it is and is not of the "West," a legal spectre that resides ambivalently in time and space.  In this paper, I examine the critical labor of temporality and spatiality ("in whose time and space?") within legal theorizations of homosexuality, and the genealogical peculiarities that such turns bring.  Some of the questions I will raise are: If homosexuality is scripted as paradoxically familiar and unfamiliar, relational and remote, what are the challenges for  legal codification? What significance does the overwhelming legal focus on native pederasty during the nineteenth century have for the representations and struggles of contemporary legal reform?

"petition," "dismissal" and "if in reply".

2:50pm Discussion

3:20pm Tea Break

3:30pm Paul Amar, UC Santa Barbara, "New Bodies of Vice: Policing Sex Trafficking and Disenfranchised Erotic Publics in Brazil and Egypt"

4:00pm Discussion

4:30-5:30pm Roundtable Discussion

 

Monday, May 15

Session 2 Moderator: David Lloyd, USC

9:00am Neferti Tadiar, UC Santa Cruz, "The Sorrows of People: Affective Labor and the Body of Revolution"

ABSTRACT

This paper explores the work of affect in the organization of the social body of the contemporary underground Philippine revolutionary movement and the conduct of armed struggle. Looking at the guerilla novel, Gera [War], and other works of revolutionary literature, film and music, as well as critical accounts of revolutionary life, I consider the political and social uses of loss, suffering, grief, fear and hope, as well the configuration of bodies shaped by these affective forces, in relation to practices of guerilla warfare, revolutionary intelligence and mass mobilization during the height of the 'People's War' from the early 1970s to the 1980s. In the light of a bloody purging of the movement's own ranks in the late 1980s, I examine the differences and continuities that obtained between the affective supports and corporealities of "people's war" and those of the counter-insurgent "total war" carried out by the fascist, militarist Philippine state.

9:20am Discussion

9:50am Sudipta Sen, UC Davis, “A Submissive Body-Polity: Governance, Subordination and the Uses of Fear in Colonial India”

ABSTRACT

A seemingly innocuous Bengali cartoon became well known in the 1870s for raising a specter of native sedition against the British Raj; it was one among a few articles that prompted the passage of the Vernacular Press Act of 1878, which sought to clamp down with some severity on anti-Raj political expression. The cartoon depicted a coolie who lay dead with his wife crying over his body. An English doctor conducted a token post-mortem while the assailant stood indifferently, smoking a cigar.  The caricature voiced a long term grievance nursed by many Indians that Europeans had the unquestioned right to assault servants and subordinates, without as much as a reprimand. The familiar defense at a court of law became notorious as the 'spleen theory': the natives of India suffering chronically from malaria, Kala Azar (Leishmaniasis), and 'Dum Dum Fever' developed inordinately enlarged spleens that ruptured at the slightest provocation.

This particular instance of the 'spleen theory' provides the main  thematic of this paper, which argues that the routinization of fear was indeed the obverse of exceptional and exemplary violence during episodes of great disorder (such as the Mutiny of 1857) that required measures intended to terrify native subjects. From the very early years of the establishment of the Company Raj in India, physical castigation of servants had been seen as the standard feature of British-Indian society in keeping with similar practices back in England. This essay explores the extension of this norm in the colonial context, advancing the argument that a certain depiction of the weaker and vulnerable Indian body was to become normative and commonplace, both in terms of law and everyday governance. I argue that this socio-pathological construction of the colonial body-polity bears rich clues to the political economy of terror and subordination under colonial rule, underscoring at the same time British anxieties about the vulnerability of the colonial state in the face of native insubordination.

10:10am Discussion

10:40am Tea Break

10:50am Bhaskar Sarkar, UC Santa Barbara,“The National Mise-en-abyme”

11:20am Discussion

11:50-12:50pm Roundtable Discussion

Home | MRG Members | Advisory Board | Publications | Goals & Objectives | Contacts | Citation
University of California, Santa Barbara